The US financial system is unusual. It has more than 4,000 insured banks where most rich countries have a handful. Its many federal and state regulators often overlap. Card payments funded by high interchange and rewards still dominate retail spending. Government-sponsored enterprises fund most of its mortgages at 30-year fixed rates. Its capital markets are the deepest in the world, and its currency is the world's. Much of what US fintechs and banks take for granted looks different elsewhere. In the UK, open banking has been mandated since 2018 and instant payments have run since 2008. India's government-sponsored UPI rail processed ~241.6bn free transactions in the year to March 2026. Brazil's central bank built Pix and made it the country's most-used payment method within a few years. China's Alipay and WeChat Pay turned apps into banks until regulators halted Ant Group's record IPO. In Kenya and Ghana, mobile operators built mass-market payment systems before banks did. This section compares the US with these systems and draws lessons for US firms at home and abroad. A worked example computes the economics of a Ghanaian mobile-money transfer, and the effect of a transaction tax on it, set against US peer-to-peer apps.
What the study covers
- 1What makes the US system distinctive
- 2The UK and the EU
- 3China: super-apps and the Ant Group reckoning
- 4India: UPI and public digital infrastructure
- 5Brazil: Pix
- 6Mobile money and M-Pesa
- 7Africa and Ghana, briefly
- 8Why US payments look the way they do
- 9Lessons for US firms
- 10Key numbers
- 11Landmark cases
- 12Pitfalls
- 13How an expert thinks about it
- 14Glossary
Technical exhibits
Worked examples, checklists and case studies included with this study.
Mobile Money Economics and E Levy Worked Example
The all-in cost of a mobile-money transfer in Ghana under each e-levy regime (2022, 2023–25 and after repeal), why the levy raised a fraction of its target, revenue per active user, a stylized agent P&L and a comparison with US P2P apps (computed in Python)